|
Post by hftwo on Sept 7, 2019 7:54:12 GMT
How can science be trusted 100% when our senses are limited to the physical universe?
Think about it, it is like some video game characters in a video game world try to analyze codes/laws within their local video game world and based on that make a conclusion about the grand objective reality, you see how absurd it is?
All things seeming "super-natural" to us right now might be very-natural in real objective reality, the things that seem "super-natural" to us might be so because whoever designed this physical universe put a whole lot of limitations into its design, conditioning the players in the world to believe that THIS IS the real-real world and things can only be/look like this and only like this.
If anything the thing we SHOULD call super-natural or un-natural is our local physical universe with its limitations, absurd ideas such as death, decay, pain etc.
|
|
|
Post by Immanuel on Sept 9, 2019 7:23:07 GMT
If thinking "out-of-the-box" it is possible to use logic to conclude that the world cannot simply exist on its own without at least some sort of "background intelligence". I mean fundamentally how can evolution know at all what to get shaped into. Reflect upon the science of the worldly evolution and you see it sounds pretty absurd. You cannot prove the supernatural directly since they seal us off in this world, but indirectly you can because you can simply reflect on how logical it is to exist without any guiding intelligence. Logical deduction leads us pretty far.
|
|